“Even an Investigation Can Turn Someone’s Life Upside Down”: Legal Analyst Weighs Repercussions for Jack Smith After Trump Case

The fallout from the conclusion of President-elect Donald Trump’s election subversion case could have unexpected consequences, potentially targeting Special Counsel Jack Smith himself. Former U.S. attorney and CNN legal analyst Elie Honig discussed the possible repercussions during an appearance on The Source with Kaitlan Collins, emphasizing the personal and financial toll even an investigation can have on its target.

“Even an investigation, I mean, there are safeguards that would hopefully prevent some sort of ridiculous indictment, but even an investigation can turn someone’s life upside down,” Honig explained. He highlighted the immense financial burden that comes with being under scrutiny, adding, “It’s extraordinarily expensive – you get a subpoena, that’s six figures to defend.”

Collins raised a potential counterargument from Trump’s team, suggesting they might respond with, “That’s what you did to us, right?” Honig acknowledged the retort but criticized the reasoning. “Yeah, it’s childlike retribution,” he said. However, he conceded that legitimate oversight could be warranted, stating, “If Trump was wronged, there is, you know, an examination to be done of that.

And I have no problem with the inspector general – DOJ’s internal watchdog – doing a dive and saying, ‘Jack Smith stepped over the line here, here, and here.’” Honig noted the inspector general has previously issued a “scathing” report on former FBI Director James Comey and suggested that a similar investigation into Smith could have significant implications if his actions are found to have crossed ethical boundaries.

However, Honig cautioned against taking such actions too far, particularly if they veer into the realm of criminal investigations. “But if you’re talking about opening criminal investigations, a whole different story,” he warned, underscoring the distinction between oversight and punitive action. Honig also pointed out that the Justice Department under Trump’s second term is likely to operate differently than during his first presidency, signaling potential shifts in priorities and strategies.

As the legal and political consequences of the election subversion case continue to ripple through Washington, questions remain about whether Trump’s allies will push for investigations into Smith or others involved in the case. For now, Honig’s comments serve as a stark reminder of the personal costs associated with legal battles and the potential for political motivations to shape future actions.